Видео

Rebnecks I know are down to earth smart people. They can work circles around desk sitting Leftists. They know Trump is working for the country and they really like how he upsets wealthy, snob Leftists. It’s the cherry on top for them and me too. Trump2024!

Al, you're sill irrelevant.

ESPECIALLY AL FRANKEN MY HERO 🦸‍♂️ YOU WOULD WIN PRESIDENCY IF YOU WERE STILL IN THE SENATE WOULD DO BETTER THEN DEAN PHILLIPS WHO RAN AS REPUBLICAN DONOR LIKE ROBERT F KENNEDY JR

GREAT JOB FORMER MINNESOTA SENATOR AL FRANKEN A GREAT LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC POLITICIAN OBEYS THE LAW UNLIKE THE MAGA REPUBLICANS WHO CAN’T OBEY LAW AND ORDER

Great episode!

REFUSE TO LET MAJORITY IN HOUSE RELEGATE ALL GOVERNANCE ! CONGRESS IS ELECTED TO GOVERN, NOT DESTROY PREVIOUS LEGISLATION THAT TOOK TIME & SKILL YO NEGOTIATE COMPROMISES FOR ALL. We are at a critical moment for protection of human rights in the digital context. All global players whose actions impact the enjoyment of human rights, especially governments who claim to be champions of human rights, must lead in the reaffirmation of the international human rights framework as a central pillar for security, development and freedom in the 21st century digital environment. Human Rights in the Digital Age Published in: Just Security We are in a period of profound societal change and disruption, almost a tectonic shift, brought on by the rapid expansion of digital communication infrastructure and exponential adoption of digital technology. Protection of human rights in the 21st Century will rest on our ability to articulate how to apply enduring human rights principles in the digital context. But we are behind the curve. ” As a former US Ambassador, I know there is more all stakeholders can be doing to advance initiatives in this domain. None of our political, social or legal institutions have caught up with the implications of this transition, and our understanding of how to protect and respect human rights is being deeply challenged. The human rights movement needs to catch up to the digital reality in which we operate. Here are three practical steps. 1. . Create a Special Rapporteur Mandate on the Right to Privacy at the UN Human Rights Council The first practical step to take in protecting human rights in the digital realm is to generate global support for the creation of a “special rapporteur” (essentially an international human rights law expert) for the right to privacy at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva at its next session in March. The creation of such a mandate would follow directly from an invitation in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age that passed by consensus on Dec. 18 in New York, under the leadership of Brazil and Germ any. The core idea is simple: when everything you say or do can be tracked and intercepted, it has a chilling effect on what you feel free to say, where you feel free to go, and with whom you choose to meet. These concerns go to the heart of the work of human rights activists and defenders around the world. 2. Contribute to Development of Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance A second practical step that can be taken to reinforce human rights promotion in the digital context would be to support further development of the multi-stakeholder approach to Internet governance that prevails today, rather than allow retrenchment toward a multilateral, state based “Westphalian” model of governance. The Internet itself has in many ways been a boon to the exercise of rights, but also has contributed to the larger trend of distribution of power away from governments to non-state actors. The Internet, which emerged through the collaboration of technologists and various other stakeholders, operates through global, trans-boundary connectivity, and does not depend on geographic borders. In effect, the Internet challenged the nation-state system that lies at the heart of the UN structure, the so-called “Westphalian” model. While individuals have been empowered through global connectivity and the free flow of information across borders, the territory-based nation-state system of governance has been tested. 3. Reinforce the Conceptualization of Human Rights Protection as a National Security Priority Finally, we need to solidify the international understanding that protection of human rights and adherence to the rule of law in the digital realm are essential to the protection of national and global security, rather than antithetical to it. All too often in the post-Snowden context, national security interests are presented in binary opposition to freedom and privacy consideration, as though there is only a zero-sum relationship between human rights and national security. In reality, human rights protection has been an essential pillar of the global security architecture since the founding of the United Nations immediately after World War II. Recent failures to adequately protect human rights and adhere to the rule of law in the digital realm has been deeply undermining of some crucial aspects of long-term national and global security. One of the most troubling aspects of the mass surveillance programs disclosed by Edward Snowden was the extent to which digital security for individual users, for data, and for networks, has been undermined in the name of protecting of national security. Digital technology has transformed the means through which human rights are both exercised and violated around the globe. The Internet has become an indispensible tool for the realization of a range of human rights, and for accelerating economic development. Yet, every day, there are new examples of how digital technologies play a role in undermining human rights - whether through a prime minister banning Twitter in Turkey; a death sentence for a posting on Facebook in Iran; bulk electronic surveillance of American citizens by the NSA; a court ruling on the right to be forgotten in Google searches in Europe; or a requirement that Internet users supply real names to service providers in China. This dual edge aspect of technology was conveyed well by a Tibetan human rights activist to the Toronto-based research group Citizen Lab: “Technology is this funny thing where it’s a lifeline, and then . . . maybe it’s your ticket to jail.” None of our political, social or legal institutions have caught up with the implications of this transition, and our understanding of how to protect and respect human rights is being deeply challenged. The human rights movement needs to catch up to the digital reality in which we operate. Here are three practical steps. 1. . Create a Special Rapporteur Mandate on the Right to Privacy at the UN Human Rights Council The first practical step to take in protecting human rights in the digital realm is to generate global support for the creation of a “special rapporteur” (essentially an international human rights law expert) for the right to privacy at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva at its next session in March. The creation of such a mandate would follow directly from an invitation in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolution on The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age that passed by consensus on Dec. 18 in New York, under the leadership of Brazil and Germany. The core idea is simple: when everything you say or do can be tracked and intercepted, it has a chilling effect on what you feel free to say, where you feel free to go, and with whom you choose to meet. These concerns go to the heart of the work of human rights activists and defenders around the world. 2. Contribute to Development of Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance A second practical step that can be taken to reinforce human rights promotion in the digital context would be to support further development of the multi-stakeholder approach to Internet governance that prevails today, rather than allow retrenchment toward a multilateral, state based “Westphalian” model of governance. The Internet itself has in many ways been a boon to the exercise of rights, but also has contributed to the larger trend of distribution of power away from governments to non-state actors. The Internet, which emerged through the collaboration of technologists and various other stakeholders, operates through global, trans-boundary connectivity, and does not depend on geographic borders. In effect, the Internet challenged the nation-state system that lies at the heart of the UN structure, the so-called “Westphalian” model. While individuals have been empowered through global connectivity and the free flow of information across borders, the territory-based nation-state system of governance has been tested. 3. Reinforce the Conceptualization of Human Rights Protection as a National Security Priority Finally, we need to solidify the international understanding that protection of human rights and adherence to the rule of law in the digital realm are essential to the protection of national and global security, rather than antithetical to it. All too often in the post-Snowden context, national security interests are presented in binary opposition to freedom and privacy consideration, as though there is only a zero-sum relationship between human rights and national security. In reality, human rights protection has been an essential pillar of the global security architecture since the founding of the United Nations immediately after World War II. Recent failures to adequately protect human rights and adhere to the rule of law in the digital realm has been deeply undermining of some crucial aspects of long-term national and global security. One of the most troubling aspects of the mass surveillance programs disclosed by Edward Snowden was the extent to which digital security for individual users, for data, and for networks, has been undermined in the name of protecting of national security.

Trump knows nothing...he is a moronic crybaby

Yeah Sarah encouraged me to say “Next!” On this podcast

“give him a B12 shot” ???? WTF Sarah sometimes you are too transparent

This is not an ideological battle, it is a propaganda battle. Al is to ideological.

When the economy comes up the President should speak about Corporate Greed! The statistics are crazy for the income gap! And Trump wants to extend their tax breaks!

I think being presidential goes out the door when dealing with t.

Do voters care about Afghanistan at this point? I don’t see that as a single issue swaying voters.

Tim Miller is my fav!

Excellent!

🗳️🇺🇸🙏💙🇵🇷🗳️🇺🇸🙏💙🗳️🇺🇸🙏💙.

Being a supporter for a planned Ethnostate is a bad look Al

the "'circumstance" Biden is in with Gaza is He needs to get the fuck out of there, why? CUZ IT'S A GENOCIDE! any other circumstance or reason to be there is massively out weighted by the fact that it's a genocide, and therefore should be let go of

well i been listening for 15 minutes, yet you haven't discussed Gaza yet, should have been first topic

Thank you Trae

I think everyone should keep in mind, that these 2 never trumpers, are just that, as soon as the threat of tRump is somewhat over, they will go back to their Ronald Reagan anti working class, Union busting, Pro Tax breaks to the super wealthy, Pro Corporation, anti government regulations, Pro Gun podiums that got us here in the first place.

1:20

Trump gave the Taliban two years notice that you would be leaving

He should ask him where Melania is!

Thanks Al, Sarah and Tim. Good watch and listen. Appreciate your perspectives and just telling like it is. Say it out loud, thank you! 👍😎😎

Love him like chicken!

Three good people talking politics.

If the economy was good, my husband would have a job. He was laid off & it took him three months to find a job. His job only lasted three months & he’s been looking almost four months! It normally takes him two months to find a job and jobs normally last at least two or three years… I talked to an acquaintance today who got laid off & decided to retire. Another person in my husband’s family has been unemployed for a year. We live 35 minutes from Silicon Valley & I’m hearing the job market is tough. A recruiter told my husband that the job market is tough for his specialty. We haven’t seen this kind of unemployment since 2009. Also, the EDD owes my husband almost four months of unemployment. He’s gone down there twice. They messed up with no explanation. Gavin Newsom’s EDD. They only take your money.

I love listening to Sarah and Tim when they’re not on The Bulwark. I like The Bulwark, but I don’t like when Sarah or Tim are interviewing others. Their wit and intellect shines when they’re the ones being interviewed.

Thank you

The number one issue on the ballot now is the preservation of our democracy. Biden needs to really hit on this during the debate.

We are in the mist of prosperity and should realize it. Unmatched and unparalleled. Enjoy victory of not money but being alive. You survived the Pandemic. Cherish life, many you know have died embrace and be grateful for the gift of life. Thank the Triune Lord.

Sherwood / Roland university of California Irvine 1980's warned us about these days then look it up.

He is just a normal guy like you or me in an extraordinary situation and handling it well. With respect for the office.

Another great podcast! But could you PLEASE update Tim Miller’s picture? He doesn’t look like a high school tough anymore. That old photo doesn’t do him justice. (Also, it’s annoying and distracting to watch that old picture while listening to the content.) Thanks!!!

Of all the upside down ideas the right has put forward, one of the funniest is the idea that the people picking fruit and mowing lawns on 100 degree days are stealing American jobs. They, not millionaires, are the reason you and I are not getting ahead. If republicans have their way, get ready for $20 a pound oranges since no REAL American would ever do those jobs. Of course then the dumb a**es would complain about the high price of oranges.

His own son served and then died from causes in Iraq. I think he might remember the suckers and losers.

American voters are terrifying.

Good conversation!

No voters are not coming to the idea he's too old on his own!!! The media started that Narrative and you Sara D don't help. JFC

💡💡💡Definitely should dig up the sound bite in his own voice that I think was from Trump about there's no climate change because it's still snows. Like way way early on but I'm quite sure Rachel Maddow has documentation of it

#EndIsrael #EndUkraine #Stein2024

FT WEEKEND/JUNE15-16, Lunch with the FT, John Neal, CEO of Lloyd's of London:'"You'll never find an insurer saying, 'I don't believe in climate change.' " Yeah, because they're playing with real money.

USA USA what a shithole and you deserve Trump you really do

gaza major issue hes biden loser with young people and they are right history will judge baza poorly

Al you did Tim dirty picking the Thumbnail pic for this podcast😆

Al/Sarah/Tim…… correct me if im wrong but i dont understand why y’all are posing tge question “what attacks from Trump shoukd Biden prepare hinself for” etc……. they are there to answer moderator questions…. and NOT given oppurtunitirs to “free associate”

Wasn’t Trump the one who freed 5000 talibans and initiated the afghan withdrawal at the very end of his term in the hopes of creating as much, for Biden, chaos as possible???

I'm in LOVE with HCR ❤🎉

29:21 What’s Al’s beef w Bobby? Have him on the pod! Hash it out!